December 2012

The know zone

  • A sixth sense
    Make sure your admissions criteria add up if you want to avoid attracting the wrath of the LGO, warns Richard Bird. More
  • Quids in
    How much teaching does £1 buy? It’s a crude estimate but with finances under increasing scrutiny, it could be a useful starting point for assessing value for money, says Sam Ellis. More
  • The leader as servant
    Janet Nevin is principal of Ashton-under-Lyne Sixth Form College in Lancashire, which was named outstanding school or college of the Year in the 2012 National BTEC Awards. A former part-time Ofsted inspector, she has also researched and reported on the career experiences of women managers in Catholic sixth form colleges. More
  • Red Nose Day 2013
    Red Nose Day is back – a chance for schools and colleges to have some fun, raise money and transform the lives of people in desperate need. More
  • Lead vocals
    Quotes from Barack Obama, Nelson Mandela, Oscar Wilde, Winston Churchhill, Indira Gandhi More
  • Adding value
    When budgets are tight, keeping staff healthy ensures your workforce is productive and supply costs are kept to a minimum. More
  • Telling fortunes?
    Will the government’s plan to replace GCSEs with EBacc Certificates have the potential to help raise standards as is intended? Or will it have the opposite effect? More
  • Leaders' Surgery
    The antidote to common leadership conundrums... More
  • Cause for grade concerns
    The ASCL Council meeting in Reading on 11-12 October was dominated by curriculum and qualifications – not just the GCSE English legal challenge, but also proposed changes to GCSE exams and the introduction of the English Baccalaureate Certificates (EBCs). More
  • Supporting success
    Many very capable leaders are put off working in challenging schools because of the vulnerability of the roles. It is better support, not higher pay, that will turn this around, says Brian Lightman. He outlines what an effective support package should look like. More
  • A war of nerves?
    Trying to win over the hearts and minds of potential students and parents is no easy feat – in many aspects it’s as daunting as facing the dreaded Ofsted inspector, says Ross Morrison McGill. More
Bookmark and Share

Will the government’s plan to replace GCSEs with EBacc Certificates have the potential to help raise standards as is intended? Or will it have the opposite effect?

Telling fortunes?

Time up for GCSEs

I am in favour of the EBacc. We have a responsibility and duty to encourage all children to understand how humanity has shaped the world in which we live; to be able to analyse evidence and present reasoned arguments based on that evidence; to understand other cultures and be able to communicate in languages other than English; to be able to marvel at nature; to understand why and how to gather data and use it to better our society; to think logically, solve problems and handle detailed information accurately; and to use our own language to express our views eloquently and succinctly. The time of GCSEs is coming to a natural end just as O levels did.

Richard Andrew
Acting headteacher, Audenshaw School,  Manchester

Evidence to support EBacc?

I think we need to be sceptical about the notion that introducing a new ‘more demanding qualification’ will raise standards. We rarely evaluate properly any change to our educational system – how does the government know if the current EBacc is having any impact in raising standards? I think we need to focus on recruiting and training top-quality teachers and give them the support, resources and time to develop their practice. Our focus in England seems to be entirely on assessment when we all know that young people succeed and make excellent progress with excellent teaching and a personalised curriculum that enables them to learn in an appropriate manner and at a pace that suits them as individuals.

Ian Flintoff

Headteacher, Alde Valley School, Suffolk

Improve what we already have

Why is there no debate about the Key Stage 4 curriculum and assessment involving educationalists? GCSEs are not ‘broke’ but they can be improved in terms of both the curriculum and the assessment process. We need to look forward and recognise the knowledge, understanding and skills that are required in modern society (and future societies). Assessment needs to be streamlined but must enable students to demonstrate a wide range of relevant skills. Learners need time to allow deeper learning, to enhance independent learning and to become more resilient. If quality is to be developed then there needs to be a change to the crude accountability mechanisms such as performance tables. Please let us improve what we have rather than enforce yet more large-scale change on our young people.

Tony Smith

Headteacher, Priory School, East Sussex

Impossible challenge

The task that has been set by the architects of the EBacc is to create a new qualification that is more demanding but no less accessible than GCSE.

This task is challenging enough but it becomes impossible when the unnecessary restriction is added that all students should take the same paper. This miraculous examination now needs questions that stretch and challenge the most able but that simultaneously allow the least able to demonstrate their skills and abilities. In a well-planned lesson with high levels of teacher input, this is differentiation at its best – in a silent examination hall, this is simply impossible. Tiered examinations allow for this kind of differentiation and provide the solution to the original challenge: Ruling them out for the reasons given has the carefully thought out illogic of an architect attempting to build a new skyscraper without the aid of weight-bearing walls.

James Handscombe
Deputy headteacher, Bexley Grammar School, Kent

Two-tier system of education

I think that it is very important that we all respond to this consultation. Personally, I feel that this is the start of a two-tier system of education within each individual establishment of the academics v the vocational students. It is interesting that students themselves have not been consulted or asked to respond; they will be the clients and perhaps we should be canvassing their thoughts on the matter. It seems the people that this will affect the most have no voice in their future.

Frances Newsome
Deputy headteacher, The McAuley Catholic High School, Doncaster

Going backwards

Such an exclusive title for a qualification! This is a step backwards and while this new exam may stretch the top 5-10 per cent of pupils, I can see it having the opposite effect on the majority. GCSE has evolved since its introduction and can present a challenge to even the most able of students while engaging the less academic. The EBacc is being rushed in on a political wave and is in danger of becoming extinct before its conception. Untested and unfit for purpose!

Martin James
Academic registrar, Rougemont School, Newport

telling-fortunes.jpg

LEADING READING